In a surprising move, the Colts have decided to waive kicker Michael Badgley, leaving fans and experts alike questioning the decision. But was it really unexpected?
The veteran kicker, with eight years of NFL experience, was released by the Colts on Tuesday, just days after missing his third extra point of the season in a crucial Week 12 game against the Houston Texans. Badgley's overall performance this season has been solid, with a successful 10 out of 11 field goal attempts and 18 out of 21 PATs.
But here's where it gets interesting: Badgley was brought in as a replacement for Spencer Shrader, who suffered a devastating injury in Week 5. With such a short time to adjust, could the Colts be making a hasty decision?
Special Teams Coordinator Brian Mason addressed the media, stating that the team is exploring all possible kicker options. He emphasized the need for a kicker who can handle pressure, be consistent, and gain the trust of the head coach, Shane Steichen.
The search is on for a kicker who can reliably convert PATs and make kicks within the 50-yard range for the remaining regular season and playoff games. And this is the part most people overlook: finding a kicker who fits the team's dynamic and can work seamlessly with the specialist unit is no easy task.
As the Colts navigate this critical decision, one can't help but wonder: Is it fair to waive a player after a few missed attempts, especially when they've shown overall consistency? Are the Colts being too hasty, or is this a calculated move to secure their playoff chances? Share your thoughts below!
